An Unusual Exclusionary Rule Case
March 9th, 2010 admin
Topics:
Wilson v. State , decided March 3 by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (the highest Texas court for criminal matters), involved two Texas statutes. The first is a Texas statutory exclusionary rule (Tex. Code Crim. Proc. § 38.23), first enacted in 1925: No evidence obtained by an officer or other person in violation of any provisions of the Constitution or laws of the State of Texas, or…
Related Posts
There is strong, if not conclusive, evidence suggesting that Texas executed an innocent man, Cameron Todd Willingham . Radley Balko reports that some fear the Lone Star state is about to do it again in the case of Hank Skinner. DNA testing of remaining evidence might put an end to such fears, and provide further evidence of Skinner’s evidence...
This is my third post in a planned series on why the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule does not apply when a police officer conducts a search that is lawful when it occurs that is later ruled unlawful before the conviction is final. This issue is being litigated all over the country right now thanks to a clash of two recent Fourth Amendment...
We previously named Verna Sue Holland, a retired judge from Texas, an Ex-Judge of the Day . Now the ex-judge — or should that be “sex judge” — is back in the news. Writes Adam Liptak, in the New York Times : Charles Dean Hood was sentenced to death in 1990 by a Texas judge who had been sleeping with the prosecutor in his...
The Supreme Court on Wednesday evening delayed the execution in Texas of Henry W. Skinner, at least until the Court acts on his new case seeking to pursue a civil rights claim that he was denied a chance to have DNA evidence tested in an attempt to prove his innocence of a triple murder more than 16 years ago. The Court’s order blocked an execution...
Over at VC, Eugene Volokh posts about the Iowa Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Cox , in which the court held that the use of propensity evidence, permitted by Iowa Code § 701.11 , violated due process. The policy against admissibility of general propensity evidence stems from ‘a fundamental sense that no one should be convicted of...
“University of Texas’ use of race in admissions goes before court; Three-judge panel is not expected to rule for several months on case challenging use of race and ethnicity in undergraduate admissions”: The Austin American-Statesman has this news update . And The Associated Press reports that ” Appeals court hears case over...
Via Grits for Breakfast , at the hand of Rick Casey at the Houston Chron : During the closed-door session in which the 13-member commission debated what sanction it should give Sharon Keller, presiding judge of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, one non-lawyer member of the commission opined that Keller should be commended for saving the state money...
In a decision issued today (here is an alternate link to the decision ), the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a Wisconsin prison’s rule forbidding inmates to play Dungeons & Dragons or possess D&D publications and materials [HT: Josh Blackman]. The prison’s rationale for the ban is that playing D&D might stimulate “gang...
(Eugene Volokh) The case is Barnes v. State (Ind. Ct. App. Apr. 15, 2010) ; I’m not an expert on the field, so I don’t know how representative this is of the law throughout the country, but it struck me as interesting. The court’s conclusion: We reverse Barnes’s disorderly conduct conviction because the State failed to prove that Barnes’s...
It’s terrible that police officer deaths in the line of duty are up 43% this year over last. Not because the death of police officers, regardless of how “line of duty” is defined, are more significant than the death of any other person, but because the untimely death of a person who happens to be a police officer is as significant...
Related Tweets from Twitter
Related News from Digg
Leave a comment
| Trackback
