Shahzad and Miranda Rights

May 5th, 2010 admin
Share/Save/Bookmark

Add To Delicious Digg This post Stumble this post
Topics:

(Orin Kerr) The New York Times reports about the interrogation of Faisal Shahzad, who was arrested for trying to explode a bomb in Times Square: The suspect, Faisal Shahzad, was interrogated without initially being read his Miranda rights under a public safety exception, and provided what the F.B.I. called “valuable intelligence and evidence.” After investigators determined there was no imminent threat to be headed off, Mr. Shahzad was later read his rights to remain silent, but he waived them and continued talking, the F.B.I. said. Authorities charged him as a civilian on Tuesday, but postponed plans to bring him to court.  Based on what we know, it sounds like the FBI made a good judgment call here. Shahzad is a U.S. citizen who has been living …


Originally posted on Volokh

 
  Related Posts
Shahzad and the Slippery Slope
There will be no Miranda issue should there come a time when Times Square Almost-Bomber Faisal Shahzad goes to trial.  He talked pre-Miranda, and he talked post.  He was a talker, as the agents around him did the Happy Dance and issued press releases about what a great job they did.  Yet the  knee-jerk outrage   was at the ready, just as it was... 
Shahzad Indicted for Times Square Bomb Attempt
Faisal Shahzad was indicted today, roughly six weeks after he was arrested for allegedly driving a bomb-laden SUV into Times Square.  Read More →
Will a 15-Day Delay Hurt the Shahzad Prosecution?
Federal law enforcement officials waited 15 days before bringing accused Times Square bomber Faisal Shahzad in front of a judge. This was not common practice, as Politico’s Josh Gerstein writes on Friday.  Read More →
"Mere Silence Doesn’t Invoke Miranda, Justices Rule"
“Mere Silence Doesn’t Invoke Miranda, Justices Rule”: Adam Liptak will have this article Wednesday in The New York Times. Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has a news update headlined ” Supreme Court: Suspects must invoke right to remain silent in interrogations .” In Wednesday’s edition of The Los Angeles Times,... 
To Faisal, With Love (Update)
The Times Square Fizzler, Faisal Shahzad, is scheduled to be arraigned today on an  indictment charging ten counts  of weapons and terrorism.  Ten counts? Ten?  Wow, he must be a really evil terrorist. When Faisal Shahzad first appeared before Magistrate Judge Yanthis, following his nice, extended, mirandized chat with the government, there were... 
Corporate Rights and Property Rights are Human Rights: Why it’s a Mistake to Conflate a Right with the Means Used to Exercise it
In my last post , I explained why it’s a mistake to deny free speech rights to people organized as corporations on the grounds that corporations aren’t “real people.” It’s true, of course, that a corporation is not a person. But the people who own and operate it are. “Corporate speech” is really just speech by people using the corporate... 
The Terrorist Safety Valve
After all the talk about whether terrorists get to enjoy our nation’s ”legal niceties” like Miranda, the hard story is that Faisal Shahzad, the so-called Times Square Bomber (but more appropriately called the Fizzler) wouldn’t stop talking.  They could have warned him once and hour, and still the guy would talk.  Miranda,... 
Prosecutors File Charges Against Times Square Bombing Suspect
Prosecutors have filed charges against Times Square bombing suspect Faisal Shahzad.  Read More →
Holder Looks to Tweak Miranda Rules, But Would a Change Hold Up?
On Meet the Press on Sunday, Attorney General Eric Holder suggested that Congress might think about broadening an exception to the Miranda rule, which says law enforcement authorities have to notify suspects of certain rights when they’re arrested.  Read More →
When does a suspect waive his right to remain silent?
Below, Ray Seilie of Harvard Law School recaps Monday’s oral argument in Berghuis v. Thompkins .  Ray’s preview of the case is available here .  Check the Berghuis v. Thompkins (08-1470) SCOTUSwiki page for additional updates. During Monday’s oral argument in Berghuis v. Thompkins , the Court focused on delineating when a suspect in... 
  Related Tweets from Twitter
9to5to9 (Debra Legg)  : I like this and might use it. ?Any errors are the fault of no-one in particular; rather, society itself is to blame.? http://bit.ly/9ee0HO..
Updated : 2010-09-08T15:58:35Z   |  Reply  |  View Tweet
mystikx20 (s w)  : Martin Wolf?s Critique of Libertarianism http://bit.ly/b93OxU..
Updated : 2010-09-08T12:56:28Z   |  Reply  |  View Tweet
Wilfner (Wilfner)  : RT @beckychr007: At Volokh Conspiracy Ilya Somin rebuts Brit econo journalist Martin Wolf?s recent diss of Libertarianism http://bit.ly/avGy..
Updated : 2010-09-08T12:36:24Z   |  Reply  |  View Tweet
VolokhC (Eugene Volokh)  : Martin Wolf?s Critique of Libertarianism: Martin Wolf, a prominent British economics journalist, has an interestin... http://bit.ly/aCsgc0..
Updated : 2010-09-08T12:03:01Z   |  Reply  |  View Tweet
selvan_tengy (tom serona)  : The Volokh Conspiracy Judge Denies Stay on Stem Cell Research ...: The Bush Administration funded embryonic stem... http://bit.ly/c1dWlK..
Updated : 2010-09-08T11:42:38Z   |  Reply  |  View Tweet
  Related News from Digg
No comments yet.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

TOP