Justice Stevens’ unfinished revival of the right to jury trial
June 14th, 2010 admin
The following essay, by Jeffrey L. Fisher , is the last in our series on John Paul Stevens. Fisher, now an associate professor of law at Stanford Law School, clerked for Justice Stevens during the 1998-1999 Supreme Court Term. This essay is adopted from remarks he made at UC Davis’ 2009 Symposium on The Honorable John Paul Stevens. In 1968, the Supreme Court…
Related Posts
The following essay for our thirty-day series on John Paul Stevens is by Norman Dorsen , the Stokes Professor of Law and Counselor to the President at New York University. Professor Dorsen has written extensively on Justice Stevens’ jurisprudence. He was president of the American Civil Liberties Union from 1976-1991. The public response...
Below is an essay for our thirty-day series on John Paul Stevens by James Liebman , the Simon H. Rifkind Professor of Law at Columbia Law School. Liebman was a clerk for Justice Stevens during the 1978 Term and has since argued several capital and habeas corpus cases before the Supreme Court. As he prepares to retire from the Supreme Court, Justice...
The newest piece in our thirty-day series honoring John Paul Stevens, below, is a tribute from Stanley Temko, a co-clerk with Justice Stevens for Justice Wiley Rutledge during the 1947 Supreme Court Term and now senior counsel at Covington & Burling. Like Justice Stevens, this year Mr. Temko celebrates his ninetieth birthday. Justice John Paul...
Below is the first essay for our thirty-day series on John Paul Stevens, by Daniel A. Farber , the Sho Sato Professor of Law at Berkeley. Farber worked as a law clerk for Justice Stevens during the 1976 Supreme Court Term. Perhaps because of his career as a litigator before he became a judge, Justice Stevens has always shown a deep appreciation...
The following essay by Jamal Greene is part of our thirty-day series on John Paul Stevens. Greene clerked for Justice Stevens during the 2006 Term, and is now a law professor at Columbia University. In the months leading up to his confirmation hearing, news emerged that in 1981, as a fledgling lawyer in the Reagan Justice Department, John Roberts...
The following essay on John Paul Stevens is by Rory Little , a professor of law at U.C. Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco. Little also serves as Reporter to the ABA Task Force to Revise the Criminal Justice Standards for the Prosecution and Defense Functions. Little worked with Justice Stevens in the 1984 Supreme Court Term. “After...
Below is an essay by Kenneth A. Manaster for our thirty-day (temporarily postponed yesterday) series on John Paul Stevens. Manaster is a law professor at Santa Clara University, and has written a book on Stevens’ involvement with a 1960s investigation of corruption on the Illinois Supreme Court, Illinois Justice: The Scandal of 1969 and...
The essay below, by Joseph Thai , is part of our thirty-day series honoring John Paul Stevens. Thai was a clerk for Justice Stevens during the 2000 October Term, and is now a professor at the University of Oklahoma College of Law. Did Justice Stevens change? That is a question on which many have proffered an opinion, from admirers to critics,...
The following essay for our thirty-day series on John Paul Stevens is by Frederick Schauer , David and Mary Harrison Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Virginia. Schauer’s research focuses on the First Amendment. His papers discussing Justice Stevens’ jurisprudence include “Justice Stevens and the Size of Constitutional...
Reactions to Justice John Paul Stevens’s retirement announcement are coming in quickly. Let’s get you up to speed on what folks are saying. Chief Justice John Roberts: Associate Justice John Paul Stevens has earned the gratitude and admiration of the American people for his nearly 40 years of distinguished service to the Judiciary, including...
Related Tweets from Twitter
Related News from Digg
Leave a comment
| Trackback













